Transparency alternatives to Magnet Forensics
Other eDiscovery and archiving vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Magnet Forensics. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 39 that differ from Magnet Forensics on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Magnet Forensics has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Magnet Forensics” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Magnet Forensics | Found at Magnet Forensics, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DISCOcsdisco.comSee also Transparency alternatives to DISCO | 52/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Data location stated, Status page with history | Compare |
| Hanzohanzo.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Hanzo | 39/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure | 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Smarshsmarsh.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Smarsh | 39/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Shieldshieldfc.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Shield | 35/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Jatheonjatheon.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Jatheon | 45/100 | 1 Data processing agreement | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| Mailbutlermailbutler.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Mailbutler | 43/100 | 1 Public pricing | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
| Digital WarRoomdigitalwarroom.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Digital WarRoom | 38/100 | 1 Public pricing | 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| CloudNinecloudnine.comSee also Transparency alternatives to CloudNine | 35/100 | 1 Public pricing | 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| GoldFynchgoldfynch.comSee also Transparency alternatives to GoldFynch | 35/100 | 1 Public pricing | 2 Status page with history, Certifications named | Compare |
| Lighthouselighthouseglobal.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Lighthouse | 35/100 | 1 Public pricing | 2 Status page with history, Certifications named | Compare |
| Everlaweverlaw.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Everlaw | 30/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 1 Data location stated | Compare |
| ComplyKEYcomplykey.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ComplyKEY | 26/100 | 1 Public pricing | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.