SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Attensi

Other E-learning authoring vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Attensi. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 31 that differ from Attensi on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Attensi has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Attensi” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at AttensiFound at Attensi, not found there
Aristarist.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Arist 52/100 4 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Courseboxcoursebox.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Coursebox 48/100 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +1 3 Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact Compare
Immerseimmerse.onlineSee also Transparency alternatives to Immerse 48/100 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +1 4 Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 Compare
Lectoraelblearning.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Lectora 43/100 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named 2 Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Easygeneratoreasygenerator.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Easygenerator 41/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named 1 Uptime SLA with a figure Compare
Ottolearnottolearn.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Ottolearn 39/100 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing 3 Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact Compare
ClickLearnclicklearn.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ClickLearn 30/100 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent 3 Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact Compare
Motive.iomotive.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Motive.io 26/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named 4 Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 Compare
Simxsimxvr.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Simx 26/100 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named 4 Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 Compare
Vectorsolutionsvectorsolutions.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Vectorsolutions 30/100 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change 3 Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact Compare
Dominknowdominknow.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Dominknow 26/100 2 Data location stated, Certifications named 3 Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact Compare
Virtivirti.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Virti 26/100 2 Status page with history, Public pricing 3 Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.