Alternatives to Fastmail
Other Email hosting vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Fastmail does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 23 that differ from Fastmail on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Fastmail has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Fastmail does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Fastmail does not | Fastmail publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yandex 360yandex.com | 35/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 3 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Gandigandi.net | 30/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named | 3 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Stalwartstalw.art | 39/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Data location stated | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Migadumigadu.com | 30/100 | 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| df.eudf.eu | 26/100 | 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact | 2 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Hushmailhushmail.com | 30/100 | 1 Data location stated | 2 No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| All-Inklall-inkl.com | 22/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 2 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Biohostbiohost.de | 22/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 2 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| OVH Mailovh.com | 19/100 | 1 Data location stated | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Stratostrato.de | 17/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 2 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Alfahostingalfahosting.de | 14/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 2 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Greenstagreensta.de | 13/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 3 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.