Alternatives to Stalwart
Other Email hosting vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Stalwart does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 23 that differ from Stalwart on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Stalwart has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Stalwart does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Stalwart does not | Stalwart publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Migadumigadu.com | 30/100 | 3 Status page with history, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| df.eudf.eu | 26/100 | 3 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing | Compare |
| All-Inklall-inkl.com | 22/100 | 3 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +1 | Compare |
| Biohostbiohost.de | 22/100 | 3 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +1 | Compare |
| Fastmailfastmail.com | 30/100 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent | 2 Data processing agreement, Data location stated | Compare |
| Gandigandi.net | 30/100 | 2 Status page with history, Certifications named | 2 Data processing agreement, Public pricing | Compare |
| mailbox.orgmailbox.org | 22/100 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent | 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing | Compare |
| Mailfencemailfence.com | 17/100 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +1 | Compare |
| Posteoposteo.de | 17/100 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +1 | Compare |
| Stratostrato.de | 17/100 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing | Compare |
| Alfahostingalfahosting.de | 14/100 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing | Compare |
| Greenstagreensta.de | 13/100 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +1 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.