Alternatives to All-Inkl
Other Email hosting vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that All-Inkl does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 22 that differ from All-Inkl on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
All-Inkl has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and All-Inkl does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and All-Inkl does not | All-Inkl publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stalwartstalw.art | 39/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +1 | 3 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Gandigandi.net | 30/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 | 3 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Yandex 360yandex.com | 35/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Fastmailfastmail.com | 30/100 | 2 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Hushmailhushmail.com | 30/100 | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Migadumigadu.com | 30/100 | 2 Status page with history, Public pricing | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| df.eudf.eu | 26/100 | 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Grommuniogrommunio.com | 22/100 | 2 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| OVH Mailovh.com | 19/100 | 2 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 3 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| mailbox.orgmailbox.org | 22/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Stratostrato.de | 17/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Infomaniakinfomaniak.com | 13/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.