SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Skiff

Other Email hosting vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Skiff does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 32 that differ from Skiff on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Skiff has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Skiff does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Skiff does notSkiff publishes, and they do not
Tutatuta.com 48/100 4 Data location stated, Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent, +1 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Yandex 360yandex.com 35/100 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Named privacy contact 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Gandigandi.net 30/100 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Migadumigadu.com 30/100 3 Status page with history, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
StartMailstartmail.com 43/100 2 Data location stated, Status page with history nothing Compare
Stalwartstalw.art 39/100 2 Data processing agreement, Data location stated 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
df.eudf.eu 26/100 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact 1 Public pricing Compare
Runboxrunbox.com 26/100 2 Status page with history, No third-party tracking before consent 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
All-Inklall-inkl.com 22/100 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact 2 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Biohostbiohost.de 22/100 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact 2 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Uberspaceuberspace.de 13/100 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact 3 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Fastmailfastmail.com 30/100 1 No third-party tracking before consent nothing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.