Transparency alternatives to Ease
Other Employee benefits vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Ease. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 38 that differ from Ease on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Ease has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Ease” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Ease | Found at Ease, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Formajoinforma.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Forma | 52/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 | 2 Status page with history, Public pricing | Compare |
| Employee Navigatoremployeenavigator.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Employee Navigator | 48/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| Nilo Healthnilohealth.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Nilo Health | 39/100 | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| Benefitfocusbenefitfocus.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Benefitfocus | 30/100 | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 2 Status page with history, Public pricing | Compare |
| Unmindunmind.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Unmind | 30/100 | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 2 Status page with history, Public pricing | Compare |
| Modern Healthmodernhealth.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Modern Health | 30/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Status page with history, Public pricing | Compare |
| Alightalight.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Alight | 22/100 | 2 Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | 2 Status page with history, Public pricing | Compare |
| Corporate Benefitscorporate-benefits.deSee also Transparency alternatives to Corporate Benefits | 22/100 | 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | 2 Status page with history, Public pricing | Compare |
| Epassiepassi.deSee also Transparency alternatives to Epassi | 17/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| givvegivve.comSee also Transparency alternatives to givve | 17/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Headspaceheadspace.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Headspace | 17/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Openupopenup.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Openup | 17/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.