Transparency alternatives to Modern Health
Other Employee benefits vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Modern Health. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 38 that differ from Modern Health on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Modern Health has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Modern Health” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Modern Health | Found at Modern Health, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nilo Healthnilohealth.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Nilo Health | 39/100 | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Formajoinforma.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Forma | 52/100 | 3 Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure, Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
| Employee Navigatoremployeenavigator.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Employee Navigator | 48/100 | 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
| Benefitfocusbenefitfocus.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Benefitfocus | 30/100 | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Unmindunmind.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Unmind | 30/100 | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Easeease.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Ease | 26/100 | 2 Status page with history, Public pricing | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Benepassgetbenepass.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Benepass | 22/100 | 2 Public pricing, Certifications named | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Corporate Benefitscorporate-benefits.deSee also Transparency alternatives to Corporate Benefits | 22/100 | 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| PeopleKeeppeoplekeep.comSee also Transparency alternatives to PeopleKeep | 22/100 | 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Epassiepassi.deSee also Transparency alternatives to Epassi | 17/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 3 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| givvegivve.comSee also Transparency alternatives to givve | 17/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 3 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Headspaceheadspace.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Headspace | 17/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 3 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.