Transparency alternatives to Corporate Benefits
Other Employee benefits vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Corporate Benefits. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 38 that differ from Corporate Benefits on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Corporate Benefits has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Corporate Benefits” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Corporate Benefits | Found at Corporate Benefits, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Formajoinforma.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Forma | 52/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Employee Navigatoremployeenavigator.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Employee Navigator | 48/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Nilo Healthnilohealth.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Nilo Health | 39/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Benefitfocusbenefitfocus.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Benefitfocus | 30/100 | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Modern Healthmodernhealth.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Modern Health | 30/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Unmindunmind.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Unmind | 30/100 | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Easeease.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Ease | 26/100 | 2 Status page with history, Public pricing | 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Benepassgetbenepass.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Benepass | 22/100 | 2 Public pricing, Certifications named | 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| PlanSourceplansource.comSee also Transparency alternatives to PlanSource | 17/100 | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | 3 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Alightalight.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Alight | 22/100 | 1 Notice before subprocessors change | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Calm Businessbusiness.calm.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Calm Business | 22/100 | 1 Data processing agreement | 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| PeopleKeeppeoplekeep.comSee also Transparency alternatives to PeopleKeep | 22/100 | 1 Public pricing | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.