SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Jamf

Other Endpoint management and security vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Jamf does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 24 that differ from Jamf on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Jamf has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Jamf does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Jamf does notJamf publishes, and they do not
Malwarebytesmalwarebytes.com 83/100 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +2 1 Certifications named Compare
Addigyaddigy.com 85/100 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +1 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Automoxautomox.com 60/100 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Iruiru.com 43/100 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Named privacy contact 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Miradoremiradore.com 39/100 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Named privacy contact 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 Compare
NinjaOneninjaone.com 52/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Fleetfleetdm.com 48/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
CrowdStrikecrowdstrike.com 43/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact 1 Status page with history Compare
SentinelOnesentinelone.com 55/100 1 Data location stated nothing Compare
Scalefusionscalefusion.com 45/100 1 Data location stated 1 Status page with history Compare
Kaseyakaseya.com 35/100 1 Subprocessor list 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Levellevel.io 35/100 1 Data location stated 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.