SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Qapita

Other Equity and cap table management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Qapita does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 29 that differ from Qapita on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Qapita has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and Qapita does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Qapita does notQapita publishes, and they do not
Cartacarta.com 70/100 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +2 nothing Compare
Hiivehiive.com 35/100 2 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Ledgyledgy.com 26/100 2 Data location stated, Certifications named 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact Compare
Nasdaq Private Marketnasdaqprivatemarket.com 17/100 2 Data processing agreement, Certifications named 3 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact Compare
Bunchbunch.capital 30/100 1 Data location stated 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Certentcertent.com 26/100 1 Data location stated 1 Public pricing Compare
Companistocompanisto.com 26/100 1 Data location stated 1 Public pricing Compare
Fairmintfairmint.com 26/100 1 Data location stated 1 Public pricing Compare
Sydecarsydecar.io 26/100 1 Certifications named nothing Compare
Allocationsallocations.com 22/100 1 Data location stated 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact Compare
Cake Equitycakeequity.com 22/100 1 Certifications named 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Gustgust.com 22/100 1 Data location stated 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.