Transparency alternatives to Carta
Other Equity and cap table management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Carta. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 27 that differ from Carta on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Carta has 4 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116). The column “Found there, not found at Carta” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Carta | Found at Carta, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hiivehiive.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Hiive | 30/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 5 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 | Compare |
| Nasdaq Private Marketnasdaqprivatemarket.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Nasdaq Private Market | 13/100 | 1 Data processing agreement | 8 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +5 | Compare |
| OneCrowdonecrowd.deSee also Transparency alternatives to OneCrowd | 9/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 8 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +5 | Compare |
| Cake Equitycakeequity.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Cake Equity | 35/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | Compare |
| Bunchbunch.capitalSee also Transparency alternatives to Bunch | 30/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 5 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 | Compare |
| Companistocompanisto.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Companisto | 26/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 5 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 | Compare |
| Fairmintfairmint.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Fairmint | 26/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 5 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 | Compare |
| Ledgyledgy.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Ledgy | 26/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 5 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 | Compare |
| Sydecarsydecar.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Sydecar | 26/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +1 | Compare |
| Corporifycorporify.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Corporify | 22/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 6 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +3 | Compare |
| Pulleypulley.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Pulley | 22/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +2 | Compare |
| Qapitaqapita.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Qapita | 22/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +2 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.