SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Fairmint

Other Equity and cap table management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Fairmint does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 19 that differ from Fairmint on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Fairmint has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and Fairmint does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Fairmint does notFairmint publishes, and they do not
Cartacarta.com 70/100 5 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 nothing Compare
Hiivehiive.com 39/100 3 Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116) 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Cake Equitycakeequity.com 22/100 2 Public pricing, Certifications named 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Nasdaq Private Marketnasdaqprivatemarket.com 17/100 2 Data processing agreement, Certifications named 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact Compare
Bunchbunch.capital 30/100 1 Public pricing 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Ledgyledgy.com 26/100 1 Certifications named 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Gustgust.com 22/100 1 Public pricing 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact Compare
SeedLegalsseedlegals.com 14/100 1 Public pricing 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Astrellaastrella.com 13/100 1 Public pricing 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Eqvistaeqvista.com 9/100 1 Public pricing 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact Compare
Certentcertent.com 26/100 nothing we found there and not here nothing Compare
Companistocompanisto.com 26/100 nothing we found there and not here nothing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.