SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Ledgy

Other Equity and cap table management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Ledgy does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 21 that differ from Ledgy on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Ledgy has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Ledgy does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Ledgy does notLedgy publishes, and they do not
Cartacarta.com 70/100 5 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 nothing Compare
Hiivehiive.com 39/100 3 Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116) 1 Certifications named Compare
SeedLegalsseedlegals.com 14/100 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Astrellaastrella.com 13/100 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Bunchbunch.capital 30/100 1 Public pricing 1 Certifications named Compare
Certentcertent.com 26/100 1 Named privacy contact 1 Certifications named Compare
Companistocompanisto.com 26/100 1 Named privacy contact 1 Certifications named Compare
Fairmintfairmint.com 26/100 1 Named privacy contact 1 Certifications named Compare
Cake Equitycakeequity.com 22/100 1 Public pricing 1 Data location stated Compare
Gustgust.com 22/100 1 Public pricing 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Levaleva.pe 17/100 1 Named privacy contact 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Nasdaq Private Marketnasdaqprivatemarket.com 17/100 1 Data processing agreement 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.