Transparency alternatives to Cozero
Other ESG reporting vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Cozero. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 27 that differ from Cozero on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Cozero has 5 gaps in what we could measure: Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116). The column “Found there, not found at Cozero” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Cozero | Found at Cozero, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coritycority.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Cority | 52/100 | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure | 4 Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | Compare |
| Normativenormative.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Normative | 39/100 | 2 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| EcoVadisecovadis.comSee also Transparency alternatives to EcoVadis | 39/100 | 1 Public pricing | 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Persefonipersefoni.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Persefoni | 39/100 | 1 Status page with history | 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Benchmark Gensuitebenchmarkgensuite.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Benchmark Gensuite | 26/100 | 1 Public pricing | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +2 | Compare |
| Diligent ESGdiligent.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Diligent ESG | 26/100 | 1 Status page with history | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +1 | Compare |
| Watershedwatershed.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Watershed | 26/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +1 | Compare |
| Intelexintelex.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Intelex | 22/100 | 1 Public pricing | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +2 | Compare |
| Novistonovisto.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Novisto | 17/100 | 1 Public pricing | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +3 | Compare |
| Seedtraceseedtrace.orgSee also Transparency alternatives to Seedtrace | 17/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +3 | Compare |
| Plan Aplana.earthSee also Transparency alternatives to Plan A | 30/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Apidayapiday.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Apiday | 26/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.