SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Seedtrace

Other ESG reporting vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Seedtrace. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 27 that differ from Seedtrace on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Seedtrace has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Seedtrace” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at SeedtraceFound at Seedtrace, not found there
Cozerocozero.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Cozero 65/100 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +3 1 No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Coritycority.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Cority 52/100 6 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +3 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent Compare
EcoVadisecovadis.comSee also Transparency alternatives to EcoVadis 39/100 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 1 No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Normativenormative.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Normative 39/100 4 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 1 No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Persefonipersefoni.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Persefoni 39/100 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 1 No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Plan Aplana.earthSee also Transparency alternatives to Plan A 30/100 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact 1 No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Diligent ESGdiligent.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Diligent ESG 26/100 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, Named privacy contact 1 No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Watershedwatershed.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Watershed 26/100 3 security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact 1 No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Apidayapiday.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Apiday 26/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact 1 No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Benchmark Gensuitebenchmarkgensuite.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Benchmark Gensuite 26/100 2 Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change 1 No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Coolsetcoolset.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Coolset 26/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact 1 No third-party tracking before consent Compare
EcoOnlineecoonline.comSee also Transparency alternatives to EcoOnline 26/100 2 Subprocessor list, Named privacy contact 1 No third-party tracking before consent Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.