SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Mark Labs

Other ESG reporting vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Mark Labs. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 27 that differ from Mark Labs on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Mark Labs has 12 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Mark Labs” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at Mark LabsFound at Mark Labs, not found there
Cozerocozero.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Cozero 65/100 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +4 nothing Compare
Normativenormative.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Normative 52/100 7 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +4 nothing Compare
Coritycority.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Cority 52/100 6 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +3 nothing Compare
EcoVadisecovadis.comSee also Transparency alternatives to EcoVadis 39/100 5 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 nothing Compare
Persefonipersefoni.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Persefoni 39/100 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 nothing Compare
Plan Aplana.earthSee also Transparency alternatives to Plan A 30/100 4 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 nothing Compare
Diligent ESGdiligent.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Diligent ESG 26/100 4 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 nothing Compare
Watershedwatershed.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Watershed 26/100 4 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, +1 nothing Compare
Apidayapiday.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Apiday 26/100 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Benchmark Gensuitebenchmarkgensuite.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Benchmark Gensuite 26/100 3 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change nothing Compare
Coolsetcoolset.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Coolset 26/100 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
EcoOnlineecoonline.comSee also Transparency alternatives to EcoOnline 26/100 3 Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact nothing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.