SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Quentic

Other ESG reporting vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Quentic does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 20 that differ from Quentic on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Quentic has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and Quentic does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Quentic does notQuentic publishes, and they do not
Normativenormative.io 52/100 5 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 1 Data location stated Compare
Coritycority.com 39/100 5 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact Compare
Cozerocozero.io 65/100 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +1 nothing Compare
Benchmark ESGbenchmarkdigital.com 39/100 2 Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Diligent ESGdiligent.com 39/100 2 Status page with history, Certifications named nothing Compare
EcoVadisecovadis.com 39/100 2 Public pricing, Certifications named nothing Compare
Persefonipersefoni.com 39/100 2 Status page with history, Certifications named nothing Compare
Intelexintelex.com 22/100 2 Public pricing, Certifications named 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Plan Aplana.earth 30/100 1 Certifications named nothing Compare
Seedtraceseedtrace.org 17/100 1 No third-party tracking before consent 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Apidayapiday.com 26/100 nothing we found there and not here nothing Compare
Coolsetcoolset.com 26/100 nothing we found there and not here nothing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.