SaaS Ranking
Menu

Stova: what they publish

stova.io · Event management · checked 2026-10-20

78/100BBand B

Rank 1 of 50 in Event management, where the median is 22.5.

Public transparency score, not a product or security rating. Latest check: 2026-10-20. How the score works.

Evidence at a glance

Choose a check to see its source, date and scope.

Not found means not found at the addresses we checked. Not measured means we could not complete the check.

Start a vendor reviewDownload evidence (CSV)

Overview

0 days since the newest dated result, 0 since the oldest. 12 of 12 criteria have a measured result in the last 30 days. Failed checks and undated results are excluded.

Evidence freshness is a statement about our measurement and is kept apart from the transparency score, which is frozen at v1. How good our own measurement is.

Transparency labelsaas-ranking.com

Stova

stova.io · Event management

  1. A
  2. B
  3. C
  4. D
  5. E
  6. F
B 78of 100 Rank 1 of 50

Published commitments8 of 9 found

Measured behaviour1 of 3 found

Checked 2026-10-20. Every line links the page we found it on. A cross means we found nothing at the addresses we checked, not that the vendor has no such document. A transparency score, not a product rating.

Downloads include all checks, source URLs, dates and the snapshot ID for your procurement file. We do not issue badges.

The label is the whole measurement in one object: every criterion with its weight, the band, and the date. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Every line in it links the page we found the result on, or lists the addresses we checked. A cross means we found nothing there, not that Stova has no such document.

Where Stova sits in Event management

  1. A0 0%
  2. B1 2%
  3. C2 4%
  4. D6 12%
  5. E15 30%
  6. F26 52%
50 vendors with a score; 6 more without a score because we could measure too little. Bands have fixed thresholds, see how the score works.

The band of Stova is marked. Vendors without a score are the ones where we could measure too few criteria to rank them – a gap on our side, counted separately.

What Stova states

The exact figures and names we read off the pages linked below, with the sentence they stand in. This is what they publish, not what we verified about their systems.

Gaps, heaviest first

✗weight 2 of 3

Third-party requests seen on the first load, before any interaction.

Checked 1 address on 2026-10-20.

Show the 1 address we checked
  1. https://stova.io/ – third-party requests before any interaction: ad.doubleclick.net, b.6sc.co, c.6sc.co, cdn-cookieyes.com, cta-service-cms2.hubspot.com, epsilon.6sense.com, ipv6.6sc.co, j.6sc.co, js.hs-scripts.com, js.hscta.net, log.cookieyes.com, no-cache.hubspot.com, pagead2.googlesyndication.com, perf.hsforms.com, pro.fontawesome.com, region1.analytics.google.com, stats.g.doubleclick.net, stovasplashdev.wpenginepowered.com, www.google.com, www.google.de, www.googletagmanager.com

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Across the market: No third-party tracking before consent in Event management: 3 of 53 companies

✗

Notice before subprocessors change

weight 2 of 3

No commitment to give notice before subprocessors change found.

Checked 8 addresses on 2026-10-20.

Show the 8 addresses we checked
  1. https://stova.io/legal/subprocessors – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  2. https://stova.io/subprocessors – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  3. https://stova.io/sub-processors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  4. https://stova.io/legal/dpa – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  5. https://stova.io/dpa – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  6. https://stova.io/legal/data-processing-agreement – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  7. https://stova.io/trust/subprocessors – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  8. https://stova.io/legal/sub-processors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Across the market: Notice before subprocessors change in Event management: 4 of 50 companies

✗

security.txt (RFC 9116)

weight 1 of 3

No security.txt found.

Checked 1 address on 2026-10-20.

Show the 1 address we checked
  1. https://stova.io/.well-known/security.txt – reached, no match (HTTP 404)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Across the market: security.txt (RFC 9116) in Event management: 7 of 47 companies

Evidence

The full source lists sit behind these two groups, so that the answer above stays readable.

Published, with a source 9
✓

Data processing agreement (DPA)

weight 3 of 3

Published and readable without a login.

Source: https://stova.io/data-processing-addendum/ · checked 2026-10-20

Across the market: Data processing agreement in Event management: 5 of 50 companies

✓

Subprocessors: the published list

weight 3 of 3

The actual list is published, not just a promise to keep one.

Source: https://stova.io/subprocessors/ · checked 2026-10-20

Across the market: Subprocessor list in Event management: 7 of 50 companies

✓

Data location: where they say data is hosted

weight 3 of 3

The hosting location is stated on a public page.

  • Locations named next to the hosting wording United States. This does not establish the company’s headquarters.
    Show the exact wording

    our services, personal data may be collected internationally and accessed from, transferred to, or stored in the United States or in other countries in which we operate or maintain hosted server locat...

    Read at https://stova.io/privacy-policy/

Source: https://stova.io/privacy-policy/ · checked 2026-10-20

Across the market: Data location stated in Event management: 20 of 50 companies

✓

Status page with incident history

weight 2 of 3

A public status page with incident history.

Source: https://status.stova.io/ · checked 2026-10-20

Across the market: Status page with history in Event management: 12 of 50 companies

✓

Public pricing with figures

weight 2 of 3

Actual numbers on a public page.

Source: https://stova.io/pricing-packages-copy/ · checked 2026-10-20

Across the market: Public pricing in Event management: 28 of 51 companies

✓

HTTPS enforced with HSTS

weight 2 of 3

HTTP redirects to HTTPS and the HSTS header is set.

  • HSTS max-age 63072000 seconds (730 days).
    Show the exact wording

    max-age=63072000; includeSubDomains; preload

    Read at https://stova.io/
  • HSTS options includeSubDomains, preload.
    Show the 2 exact wordings

    max-age=63072000; includeSubDomains; preload

    Read at https://stova.io/

    max-age=63072000; includeSubDomains; preload

    Read at https://stova.io/

Source: https://stova.io/ · checked 2026-10-20

Across the market: HTTPS enforced with HSTS in Event management: 35 of 53 companies

✓

Certifications named (SOC 2, ISO 27001)

weight 1 of 3

SOC 2 or ISO 27001 named on a public page.

  • Named on that page ISO/IEC 27001 (not counted: the sentence does not carry it), SOC 2 (not counted: the sentence does not carry it). The sentence we kept does not carry this finding on its own, so it counts in no list and no figure.
    Show the 2 exact wordings

    ISO 27001 Registration Security Token Users can choose which events in your portfolio require a higher level

    Read at https://stova.io/security-certifications/

    Book a Demo Secure Your Event with Stova SOC 2 Website Security Token Security tokens are useful for when the event is private or is for a specifi

    Read at https://stova.io/security-certifications/

Source: https://stova.io/security-certifications/ · checked 2026-10-20

Across the market: Certifications named in Event management: 14 of 51 companies

✓

Uptime SLA with a figure

weight 1 of 3

An availability commitment with a figure.

  • Highest uptime figure on that page 99.72 %.
    Show the exact wording

    Using the formula above, the total availability percentage for that month was 99.72%.

    Read at https://stova.io/sla-stova/

Source: https://stova.io/sla-stova/ · checked 2026-10-20

Across the market: Uptime SLA with a figure in Event management: 1 of 49 companies

✓

Named privacy contact (DPO or privacy address)

weight 1 of 3

A data protection officer or a dedicated privacy address is named.

Source: https://stova.io/privacy-policy/ · checked 2026-10-20

Across the market: Named privacy contact in Event management: 17 of 50 companies

History

100 0 2026-10-13: 78 of 1002026-10-20: 78 of 100 2026-10-13 2026-10-20
Score over the last 2 runs we measured Stova in: 78 (2026-10-13), 78 (2026-10-20).

Prepare your vendor review

A source is a starting point. Check the product, plan, legal entity and date before treating it as evidence for your purchase. These questions do not change the transparency score.

Stova

9 found · 3 not found · 0 not measured across 12 public checks.

12 of 12 criteria have a measured result from the last 30 days. Oldest dated result: 2026-10-20.

Investigate 3 open evidence questions
  1. No third-party tracking before consent

    Which third-party requests occur before a visitor makes a choice, and for what purpose? Please distinguish the public website from the product.

    Inspect this check
  2. security.txt (RFC 9116)

    Where should we report a vulnerability, and what acknowledgement and follow-up process should we expect?

    Inspect this check
  3. Notice before subprocessors change

    How will you notify us before a subprocessor changes, with how much notice, and what response options apply to our contract?

    Inspect this check

Compare

A shortlist holds up to six vendors across categories and lives entirely in the address of its page: share the link, bookmark it, put it in a ticket. Nothing is stored, so we do not know it exists.