Transparency alternatives to Stova
Other Event management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Stova. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 48 that differ from Stova on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Stova has 3 gaps in what we could measure: No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Stova” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Stova | Found at Stova, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mentimetermentimeter.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Mentimeter | 65/100 | 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change | 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Crowdcastcrowdcast.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Crowdcast | 57/100 | 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change | 5 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 | Compare |
| Slidoslido.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Slido | 48/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | Compare |
| EventWorksgeteventworks.comSee also Transparency alternatives to EventWorks | 43/100 | 1 Notice before subprocessors change | 6 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +3 | Compare |
| Zuddlzuddl.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Zuddl | 43/100 | 1 Notice before subprocessors change | 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +2 | Compare |
| Swapcardswapcard.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Swapcard | 35/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +2 | Compare |
| Timely Eventstime.lySee also Transparency alternatives to Timely Events | 32/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +4 | Compare |
| SpeechWirespeechwire.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SpeechWire | 30/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 7 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +4 | Compare |
| Ticket Tailortickettailor.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Ticket Tailor | 22/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +4 | Compare |
| Meetingselectmeetingselect.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Meetingselect | 13/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 8 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +5 | Compare |
| Pretixpretix.euSee also Transparency alternatives to Pretix | 13/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 8 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +5 | Compare |
| Bizzabobizzabo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Bizzabo | 61/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 2 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.