Transparency alternatives to Crowdcast
Other Event management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Crowdcast. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 49 that differ from Crowdcast on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Crowdcast has 6 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Crowdcast” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Crowdcast | Found at Crowdcast, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stovastova.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Stova | 78/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 | 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Bizzabobizzabo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Bizzabo | 61/100 | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Mentimetermentimeter.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Mentimeter | 65/100 | 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
| Fourwavesfourwaves.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Fourwaves | 48/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Named privacy contact | 3 Subprocessor list, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Slidoslido.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Slido | 48/100 | 2 Status page with history, Certifications named | 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Eventzillaeventzilla.netSee also Transparency alternatives to Eventzilla | 43/100 | 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 3 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Schedsched.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Sched | 43/100 | 2 Status page with history, Certifications named | 3 Subprocessor list, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Zuddlzuddl.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Zuddl | 43/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Certifications named | 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Acceleventsaccelevents.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Accelevents | 39/100 | 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 3 Subprocessor list, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Swapcardswapcard.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Swapcard | 30/100 | 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 4 Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | Compare |
| BigMarkerbigmarker.comSee also Transparency alternatives to BigMarker | 26/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Named privacy contact | 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, +2 | Compare |
| vFairsvfairs.comSee also Transparency alternatives to vFairs | 22/100 | 2 Status page with history, Certifications named | 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, +2 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.