SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Mentimeter

Other Event management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Mentimeter. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 49 that differ from Mentimeter on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Mentimeter has 4 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent. The column “Found there, not found at Mentimeter” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at MentimeterFound at Mentimeter, not found there
Stovastova.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Stova 78/100 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Bizzabobizzabo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Bizzabo 61/100 1 Status page with history 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Fourwavesfourwaves.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Fourwaves 48/100 1 Data processing agreement 4 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 Compare
Slidoslido.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Slido 48/100 1 Status page with history 3 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact Compare
EventWorksgeteventworks.comSee also Transparency alternatives to EventWorks 43/100 1 Data processing agreement 5 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 Compare
Schedsched.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Sched 43/100 1 Status page with history 4 Subprocessor list, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, +1 Compare
Zuddlzuddl.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Zuddl 43/100 1 Data processing agreement 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 Compare
Timely Eventstime.lySee also Transparency alternatives to Timely Events 32/100 1 No third-party tracking before consent 5 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 Compare
SpeechWirespeechwire.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SpeechWire 30/100 1 No third-party tracking before consent 6 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +3 Compare
Airmeetairmeet.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Airmeet 26/100 1 Status page with history 6 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +3 Compare
BigMarkerbigmarker.comSee also Transparency alternatives to BigMarker 26/100 1 Data processing agreement 6 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, +3 Compare
vFairsvfairs.comSee also Transparency alternatives to vFairs 22/100 1 Status page with history 6 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, +3 Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.