SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to SpeechWire

Other Event management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that SpeechWire does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 47 that differ from SpeechWire on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

SpeechWire has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and SpeechWire does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and SpeechWire does notSpeechWire publishes, and they do not
Stovastova.io 70/100 7 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +4 2 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Mentimetermentimeter.com 61/100 5 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), +2 1 No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Slidoslido.com 48/100 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 2 Subprocessor list, No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Bizzabobizzabo.com 48/100 4 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 1 No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Fourwavesfourwaves.com 48/100 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 2 Subprocessor list, No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Schedsched.com 43/100 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 2 Subprocessor list, No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Zuddlzuddl.com 43/100 4 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 2 Subprocessor list, No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Swapcardswapcard.com 35/100 4 Data location stated, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 2 Subprocessor list, No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Crowdcastcrowdcast.io 43/100 3 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change 1 No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Acceleventsaccelevents.com 35/100 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact 2 Subprocessor list, No third-party tracking before consent Compare
BigMarkerbigmarker.com 29/100 3 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact 3 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Brellabrella.io 26/100 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact 3 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.