SaaS Ranking
Menu

Unco Data Systems: what they publish

uncodata.com · Field service management · checked 2026-09-27

0/100FBand F

Rank 54 of 57 in Field service management, where the median is 17.

Our snapshot contains measured results for 12 of 12 criteria for Unco Data Systems. Latest check: 2026-09-27. We found 0 with a source and did not find 12 at the addresses we checked. That is a transparency score of 0 out of 100, band F.

Prepare your vendor review

A source is a starting point. Check the product, plan, legal entity and date before treating it as evidence for your purchase. These questions do not change the transparency score.

Unco Data Systems

0 found · 12 not found · 0 not measured across 12 public checks.

12 of 12 criteria have a measured result from the last 30 days. Oldest dated result: 2026-09-27.

Investigate 12 open evidence questions
  1. Data processing agreement

    Please share the current data processing agreement for the product and plan we are considering, including its annexes and signing process.

    Inspect this check
  2. Subprocessor list

    Which subprocessors apply to our product, what does each process, and in which countries? Please share the current list.

    Inspect this check
  3. Data location stated

    Which locations apply to our primary data, backups and support access? Which region can we select for this plan?

    Inspect this check
  4. Status page with history

    Where can we review incident history for the service we will use, and how do we subscribe to incident updates?

    Inspect this check
  5. Public pricing

    Please confirm the total cost for our seats and usage, including minimum commitments, add-ons, overages and renewal terms.

    Inspect this check
  6. Certifications named

    Please share the current certificate or audit report and its scope, covered legal entity, products and validity period.

    Inspect this check
  7. Uptime SLA with a figure

    Which availability commitment applies to our plan? Please include the measurement window, exclusions and credit claim process.

    Inspect this check
  8. HTTPS enforced with HSTS

    How is HTTPS enforced on the product and sign-in domains we will use? Please distinguish those domains from the public website.

    Inspect this check
  9. No third-party tracking before consent

    Which third-party requests occur before a visitor makes a choice, and for what purpose? Please distinguish the public website from the product.

    Inspect this check
  10. security.txt (RFC 9116)

    Where should we report a vulnerability, and what acknowledgement and follow-up process should we expect?

    Inspect this check
  11. Notice before subprocessors change

    How will you notify us before a subprocessor changes, with how much notice, and what response options apply to our contract?

    Inspect this check
  12. Named privacy contact

    Which privacy contact handles requests for our account, and what escalation path should we use?

    Inspect this check
Jump to a criterion 12

Overview

4 days since the newest dated result, 4 since the oldest. 12 of 12 criteria have a measured result in the last 30 days. Failed checks and undated results are excluded.

Evidence freshness is a statement about our measurement and is kept apart from the transparency score, which is frozen at v1. How good our own measurement is.

Transparency labelsaas-ranking.com

Unco Data Systems

uncodata.com · Field service management

  1. A
  2. B
  3. C
  4. D
  5. E
  6. F
F 0of 100 Rank 54 of 57

Published commitments0 of 9 found

Measured behaviour0 of 3 found

Checked 2026-09-27. Every line links the page we found it on. A cross means we found nothing at the addresses we checked, not that the vendor has no such document. A transparency score, not a product rating.

The evidence pack carries every criterion with its source, the addresses we checked, the date and the data snapshot id – the four things a procurement file needs and a screenshot loses. We do not issue badges: a badge is the first step towards a paid placement, and there is none here.

The label is the whole measurement in one object: every criterion with its weight, the band, and the date. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Every line in it links the page we found the result on, or lists the addresses we checked. A cross means we found nothing there, not that Unco Data Systems has no such document.

Where Unco Data Systems sits in Field service management

  1. A0 0%
  2. B0 0%
  3. C0 0%
  4. D3 5%
  5. E12 21%
  6. F42 74%
57 vendors with a score; 4 more without a score because we could measure too little. Bands have fixed thresholds, see how the score works.

The band of Unco Data Systems is marked. Vendors without a score are the ones where we could measure too few criteria to rank them – a gap on our side, counted separately.

What Unco Data Systems states

The exact figures and names we read off the pages linked below, with the sentence they stand in. This is what they publish, not what we verified about their systems.

Gaps, heaviest first

✗

Data processing agreement (DPA)

weight 3 of 3

No data processing agreement found.

Checked 8 addresses on 2026-09-27.

Show the 8 addresses we checked
  1. https://uncodata.com/legal/dpa – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  2. https://uncodata.com/dpa – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  3. https://uncodata.com/legal/data-processing-agreement – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  4. https://uncodata.com/data-processing-agreement – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  5. https://uncodata.com/legal/data-processing-addendum – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  6. https://uncodata.com/legal/gdpr – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  7. https://uncodata.com/trust/dpa – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  8. https://uncodata.com/privacy/dpa – reached, no match (HTTP 404)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Across the market: Data processing agreement in Field service management: 3 of 59 companies

✗

Subprocessors: the published list

weight 3 of 3

No subprocessor list found.

Checked 7 addresses on 2026-09-27.

Show the 7 addresses we checked
  1. https://uncodata.com/legal/subprocessors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  2. https://uncodata.com/subprocessors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  3. https://uncodata.com/sub-processors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  4. https://uncodata.com/legal/sub-processors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  5. https://uncodata.com/trust/subprocessors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  6. https://uncodata.com/privacy/subprocessors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  7. https://uncodata.com/legal/subprocessor-list – reached, no match (HTTP 404)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Across the market: Subprocessor list in Field service management: 2 of 59 companies

✗

Data location: where they say data is hosted

weight 3 of 3

No statement about data location found.

Checked 7 addresses on 2026-09-27.

Show the 7 addresses we checked
  1. https://uncodata.com/security – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  2. https://uncodata.com/trust – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  3. https://uncodata.com/legal/privacy – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  4. https://uncodata.com/privacy – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  5. https://uncodata.com/privacy-policy – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  6. https://uncodata.com/compliance – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  7. https://uncodata.com/legal/privacy-policy – reached, no match (HTTP 404)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Across the market: Data location stated in Field service management: 7 of 60 companies

✗

Status page with incident history

weight 2 of 3

No public status page found.

Checked 3 addresses on 2026-09-27.

Show the 3 addresses we checked
  1. https://status.uncodata.com/ – The name "status.uncodata.com" could not be resolved.
  2. https://uncodata.com/status – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  3. https://uncodata.com.statuspage.io/ – Could not be fetched: fetch failed.

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Across the market: Status page with history in Field service management: 16 of 57 companies

✗

Public pricing with figures

weight 2 of 3

No public pricing with figures found.

Checked 5 addresses on 2026-09-27.

Show the 5 addresses we checked
  1. https://uncodata.com/pricing – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  2. https://uncodata.com/pricing/ – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  3. https://uncodata.com/plans – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  4. https://uncodata.com/en/pricing – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  5. https://uncodata.com/pricing-plans – reached, no match (HTTP 404)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Across the market: Public pricing in Field service management: 32 of 58 companies

✗

HTTPS enforced with HSTS

weight 2 of 3

No enforced HTTPS with HSTS found.

Checked 2 addresses on 2026-09-27.

Show the 2 addresses we checked
  1. http://uncodata.com/ – redirects to https://uncodata.com/
  2. https://uncodata.com/ – no HSTS header

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Across the market: HTTPS enforced with HSTS in Field service management: 25 of 60 companies

✗weight 2 of 3

Third-party requests seen on the first load, before any interaction.

Checked 1 address on 2026-09-27.

Show the 1 address we checked
  1. https://uncodata.com/ – third-party requests before any interaction: fonts.gstatic.com, region1.analytics.google.com, stats.g.doubleclick.net, www.google.com, www.google.de, www.googletagmanager.com, www.gstatic.com

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Across the market: No third-party tracking before consent in Field service management: 2 of 61 companies

✗

Notice before subprocessors change

weight 2 of 3

No commitment to give notice before subprocessors change found.

Checked 8 addresses on 2026-09-27.

Show the 8 addresses we checked
  1. https://uncodata.com/legal/subprocessors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  2. https://uncodata.com/subprocessors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  3. https://uncodata.com/sub-processors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  4. https://uncodata.com/legal/dpa – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  5. https://uncodata.com/dpa – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  6. https://uncodata.com/legal/data-processing-agreement – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  7. https://uncodata.com/trust/subprocessors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  8. https://uncodata.com/legal/sub-processors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Across the market: Notice before subprocessors change in Field service management: 2 of 57 companies

✗

Certifications named (SOC 2, ISO 27001)

weight 1 of 3

No named certification found.

Checked 6 addresses on 2026-09-27.

Show the 6 addresses we checked
  1. https://uncodata.com/security – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  2. https://uncodata.com/trust – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  3. https://uncodata.com/trust-center – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  4. https://uncodata.com/compliance – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  5. https://uncodata.com/legal/security – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  6. https://trust.uncodata.com/ – The name "trust.uncodata.com" could not be resolved.

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Across the market: Certifications named in Field service management: 8 of 58 companies

✗

Uptime SLA with a figure

weight 1 of 3

No uptime figure found.

Checked 6 addresses on 2026-09-27.

Show the 6 addresses we checked
  1. https://uncodata.com/legal/sla – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  2. https://uncodata.com/sla – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  3. https://uncodata.com/legal/service-level-agreement – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  4. https://uncodata.com/trust/sla – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  5. https://uncodata.com/uptime – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  6. https://uncodata.com/legal/uptime-sla – reached, no match (HTTP 404)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Across the market: Uptime SLA with a figure in Field service management: 2 of 57 companies

✗

security.txt (RFC 9116)

weight 1 of 3

No security.txt found.

Checked 1 address on 2026-09-27.

Show the 1 address we checked
  1. https://uncodata.com/.well-known/security.txt – reached, no match (HTTP 404)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Across the market: security.txt (RFC 9116) in Field service management: 6 of 54 companies

✗

Named privacy contact (DPO or privacy address)

weight 1 of 3

No named privacy contact found.

Checked 7 addresses on 2026-09-27.

Show the 7 addresses we checked
  1. https://uncodata.com/legal/privacy – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  2. https://uncodata.com/privacy – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  3. https://uncodata.com/privacy-policy – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  4. https://uncodata.com/legal/privacy-policy – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  5. https://uncodata.com/legal/privacy-notice – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  6. https://uncodata.com/trust/privacy – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  7. https://uncodata.com/datenschutz – reached, no match (HTTP 404)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Across the market: Named privacy contact in Field service management: 18 of 57 companies

Evidence

The full source lists sit behind these two groups, so that the answer above stays readable.

Nothing to show here yet.

History

Not enough completed runs yet to draw a line. The next runs fill this in.

Compare

A shortlist holds up to six vendors across categories and lives entirely in the address of its page: share the link, bookmark it, put it in a ticket. Nothing is stored, so we do not know it exists.