Transparency alternatives to Actsoft
Other Field service management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Actsoft does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 56 that differ from Actsoft on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Actsoft has 11 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Actsoft does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Actsoft does not | Actsoft publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ServiceM8servicem8.com | 48/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| Praxedopraxedo.com | 43/100 | 5 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Fulcrumfulcrumapp.com | 42/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| FieldEdgefieldedge.com | 36/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Payacapayaca.com | 35/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| ServiceTitanservicetitan.com | 30/100 | 4 Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Uptickuptickhq.com | 30/100 | 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Arezarez.io | 26/100 | 4 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| ServicePowerservicepower.com | 26/100 | 4 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Jobbergetjobber.com | 35/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | nothing | Compare |
| Bella FSMbellafsm.com | 26/100 | 3 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Fieldcodefieldcode.com | 26/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.