Transparency alternatives to Insezo
Other Field service management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Insezo does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 56 that differ from Insezo on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Insezo has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Insezo does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Insezo does not | Insezo publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ServiceM8servicem8.com | 48/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Praxedopraxedo.com | 43/100 | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Fulcrumfulcrumapp.com | 42/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| FieldEdgefieldedge.com | 36/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Skeduloskedulo.com | 30/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| ServiceTitanservicetitan.com | 30/100 | 3 Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
| Uptickuptickhq.com | 30/100 | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Arezarez.io | 26/100 | 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Fieldcodefieldcode.com | 26/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| ServicePowerservicepower.com | 26/100 | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| OptimoRouteoptimoroute.com | 22/100 | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, Named privacy contact | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Payacapayaca.com | 22/100 | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.