Transparency alternatives to Vertical Solutions VServiceManagement
Other Field service management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Vertical Solutions VServiceManagement does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 47 that differ from Vertical Solutions VServiceManagement on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Vertical Solutions VServiceManagement has 12 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Vertical Solutions VServiceManagement does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Vertical Solutions VServiceManagement does not | Vertical Solutions VServiceManagement publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ServiceM8servicem8.com | 48/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +3 | nothing | Compare |
| Praxedopraxedo.com | 43/100 | 5 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| ServiceTitanservicetitan.com | 30/100 | 5 Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| Fulcrumfulcrumapp.com | 42/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| FieldEdgefieldedge.com | 36/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Jobbergetjobber.com | 35/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Payacapayaca.com | 35/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Uptickuptickhq.com | 30/100 | 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Arezarez.io | 26/100 | 4 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| ServicePowerservicepower.com | 26/100 | 4 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Bella FSMbellafsm.com | 26/100 | 3 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent | nothing | Compare |
| Fieldcodefieldcode.com | 26/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.