SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Health-e Pro

Other Food safety and traceability vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Health-e Pro. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 30 that differ from Health-e Pro on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Health-e Pro has 12 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Health-e Pro” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at Health-e ProFound at Health-e Pro, not found there
Checkitcheckit.netSee also Transparency alternatives to Checkit 39/100 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 nothing Compare
Controlantcontrolant.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Controlant 35/100 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 nothing Compare
MonitorQAmonitorqa.comSee also Transparency alternatives to MonitorQA 35/100 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 nothing Compare
Trustwelltrustwell.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Trustwell 35/100 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 nothing Compare
Intertek Alchemyalchemysystems.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Intertek Alchemy 30/100 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Squizifysquizify.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Squizify 26/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named nothing Compare
SafetyChainsafetychain.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SafetyChain 23/100 3 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Tivetive.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Tive 22/100 3 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Ecolab Digitalecolab.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Ecolab Digital 23/100 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare
SoftSpecsoftspec.co.ukSee also Transparency alternatives to SoftSpec 22/100 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare
FoodDocsfooddocs.comSee also Transparency alternatives to FoodDocs 17/100 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare
Datatracemesalabs.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Datatrace 13/100 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact nothing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.