Transparency alternatives to iFoodDS
Other Food safety and traceability vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at iFoodDS. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 26 that differ from iFoodDS on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
iFoodDS has 11 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at iFoodDS” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at iFoodDS | Found at iFoodDS, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Controlantcontrolant.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Controlant | 39/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| MonitorQAmonitorqa.comSee also Transparency alternatives to MonitorQA | 35/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
| Trustwelltrustwell.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Trustwell | 35/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
| Checkitcheckit.netSee also Transparency alternatives to Checkit | 30/100 | 3 Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure, Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
| Intertek Alchemyalchemysystems.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Intertek Alchemy | 30/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Squizifysquizify.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Squizify | 26/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| SafetyChainsafetychain.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SafetyChain | 23/100 | 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
| Tivetive.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Tive | 22/100 | 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
| Ecolab Digitalecolab.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Ecolab Digital | 23/100 | 1 Data location stated | nothing | Compare |
| SoftSpecsoftspec.co.ukSee also Transparency alternatives to SoftSpec | 22/100 | 1 Data location stated | nothing | Compare |
| FoodDocsfooddocs.comSee also Transparency alternatives to FoodDocs | 17/100 | 1 Public pricing | nothing | Compare |
| Datatracemesalabs.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Datatrace | 13/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.