SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to iDenfy

Other Fraud prevention and identity vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at iDenfy. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 46 that differ from iDenfy on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

iDenfy has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at iDenfy” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at iDenfyFound at iDenfy, not found there
Feedzaifeedzai.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Feedzai 39/100 4 Data processing agreement, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, +1 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named Compare
Socuresocure.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Socure 52/100 3 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact nothing Compare
IDnowidnow.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to IDnow 43/100 3 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact 1 Public pricing Compare
PXL Visionpxl-vision.comSee also Transparency alternatives to PXL Vision 43/100 3 security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact 1 Public pricing Compare
Sardinesardine.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Sardine 43/100 3 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact 1 Public pricing Compare
Signifydsignifyd.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Signifyd 35/100 3 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact 2 Data location stated, Certifications named Compare
Vouchedvouched.idSee also Transparency alternatives to Vouched 43/100 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact 1 Certifications named Compare
Alloyalloy.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Alloy 39/100 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact 1 Public pricing Compare
Firmcheckfirmcheck.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Firmcheck 35/100 2 Data processing agreement, Named privacy contact 2 Data location stated, Certifications named Compare
Sumsubsumsub.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Sumsub 35/100 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Data location stated, Certifications named Compare
Veriffveriff.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Veriff 35/100 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact 1 Data location stated Compare
hCaptchahcaptcha.comSee also Transparency alternatives to hCaptcha 33/100 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact 2 Data location stated, Certifications named Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.