Alternatives to Feedzai
Other Fraud prevention and identity vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Feedzai does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 24 that differ from Feedzai on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Feedzai has 6 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent. The column “publishes and Feedzai does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Feedzai does not | Feedzai publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Veriffveriff.com | 48/100 | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named | 3 Data processing agreement, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Socuresocure.com | 39/100 | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named | 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Alloyalloy.com | 39/100 | 2 Status page with history, Certifications named | 3 Data processing agreement, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Shufti Proshuftipro.com | 36/100 | 2 Public pricing, Certifications named | 3 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Ondatoondato.com | 35/100 | 2 Public pricing, Certifications named | 4 Data processing agreement, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | Compare |
| Signifydsignifyd.com | 35/100 | 2 Status page with history, Public pricing | 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| ClearSaleclear.sale | 26/100 | 2 Status page with history, Public pricing | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), +2 | Compare |
| Fingerprintfingerprint.com | 22/100 | 2 Public pricing, Certifications named | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), +2 | Compare |
| NoFraudnofraud.com | 17/100 | 2 Status page with history, Public pricing | 6 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +3 | Compare |
| AU10TIXau10tix.com | 13/100 | 2 Public pricing, Certifications named | 6 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +3 | Compare |
| IDnowidnow.io | 39/100 | 1 Status page with history | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| PXL Visionpxl-vision.com | 35/100 | 1 Certifications named | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.