SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Firmcheck

Other Fraud prevention and identity vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Firmcheck. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 45 that differ from Firmcheck on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Firmcheck has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Firmcheck” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at FirmcheckFound at Firmcheck, not found there
Socuresocure.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Socure 52/100 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) 1 Data processing agreement Compare
IDnowidnow.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to IDnow 43/100 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Data processing agreement, Public pricing Compare
Sardinesardine.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Sardine 43/100 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Data processing agreement, Public pricing Compare
Incodeincode.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Incode 26/100 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +1 Compare
hCaptchahcaptcha.comSee also Transparency alternatives to hCaptcha 52/100 2 Status page with history, No third-party tracking before consent 1 Data processing agreement Compare
Alloyalloy.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Alloy 39/100 2 Status page with history, Certifications named 2 Data processing agreement, Public pricing Compare
Feedzaifeedzai.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Feedzai 39/100 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change 2 Data location stated, Public pricing Compare
iDenfyidenfy.comSee also Transparency alternatives to iDenfy 39/100 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Data processing agreement, Named privacy contact Compare
PXL Visionpxl-vision.comSee also Transparency alternatives to PXL Vision 35/100 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Data processing agreement, Public pricing Compare
Signifydsignifyd.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Signifyd 35/100 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Data processing agreement, Data location stated Compare
Veriffveriff.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Veriff 35/100 2 Status page with history, Certifications named 2 Data processing agreement, Data location stated Compare
Yotiyoti.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Yoti 35/100 2 Status page with history, Certifications named 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Named privacy contact Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.