Transparency alternatives to Signifyd
Other Fraud prevention and identity vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Signifyd. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 46 that differ from Signifyd on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Signifyd has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Signifyd” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Signifyd | Found at Signifyd, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PXL Visionpxl-vision.comSee also Transparency alternatives to PXL Vision | 43/100 | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Status page with history, Public pricing | Compare |
| Truliootrulioo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Trulioo | 26/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | 5 Status page with history, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | Compare |
| IDnowidnow.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to IDnow | 43/100 | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Alloyalloy.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Alloy | 39/100 | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | 2 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Feedzaifeedzai.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Feedzai | 39/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Status page with history, Public pricing | Compare |
| iDenfyidenfy.comSee also Transparency alternatives to iDenfy | 35/100 | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | 3 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Yotiyoti.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Yoti | 35/100 | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | 3 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Wyllowyllo.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Wyllo | 30/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | 4 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | Compare |
| Vouchedvouched.idSee also Transparency alternatives to Vouched | 43/100 | 1 Data location stated | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Socuresocure.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Socure | 39/100 | 1 Certifications named | nothing | Compare |
| Firmcheckfirmcheck.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Firmcheck | 35/100 | 1 Data processing agreement | 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| InScope-AMLinscope-aml.comSee also Transparency alternatives to InScope-AML | 35/100 | 1 Data location stated | 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.