SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Wyllo

Other Fraud prevention and identity vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Wyllo. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 47 that differ from Wyllo on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Wyllo has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Wyllo” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at WylloFound at Wyllo, not found there
IDnowidnow.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to IDnow 43/100 6 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +3 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
PXL Visionpxl-vision.comSee also Transparency alternatives to PXL Vision 43/100 5 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 2 Data processing agreement, Public pricing Compare
Alloyalloy.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Alloy 39/100 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Socuresocure.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Socure 39/100 5 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Sardinesardine.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Sardine 30/100 5 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Vouchedvouched.idSee also Transparency alternatives to Vouched 43/100 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Signifydsignifyd.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Signifyd 35/100 4 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Veriffveriff.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Veriff 35/100 4 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Yotiyoti.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Yoti 35/100 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Incodeincode.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Incode 26/100 4 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Feedzaifeedzai.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Feedzai 39/100 3 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact 1 Public pricing Compare
Sumsubsumsub.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Sumsub 37/100 3 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) 1 Data processing agreement Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.