SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Incode

Other Fraud prevention and identity vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Incode does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 33 that differ from Incode on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Incode has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Incode does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Incode does notIncode publishes, and they do not
Feedzaifeedzai.com 52/100 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 2 Status page with history, Certifications named Compare
Veriffveriff.com 48/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
ComplyAdvantagecomplyadvantage.com 30/100 3 Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Sardinesardine.ai 43/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Alloyalloy.com 39/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
IDnowidnow.io 39/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact 1 Certifications named Compare
Socuresocure.com 39/100 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Sumsubsumsub.com 39/100 2 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent 1 Certifications named Compare
Shufti Proshuftipro.com 36/100 2 Data location stated, Public pricing 1 Status page with history Compare
iDenfyidenfy.com 35/100 2 Data location stated, Public pricing 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Ondatoondato.com 35/100 2 Data location stated, Public pricing 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
PXL Visionpxl-vision.com 35/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact 1 Status page with history Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.