Transparency alternatives to Affinity
Other Fund administration and private markets vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Affinity. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 25 that differ from Affinity on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Affinity has 4 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116). The column “Found there, not found at Affinity” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Affinity | Found at Affinity, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intappintapp.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Intapp | 57/100 | 1 Data processing agreement | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Standard Metricsstandardmetrics.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Standard Metrics | 57/100 | 1 Data processing agreement | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Visiblevisible.vcSee also Transparency alternatives to Visible | 52/100 | 1 Data processing agreement | 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Runditrundit.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Rundit | 39/100 | 1 Data processing agreement | 5 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 | Compare |
| Anduinanduintransact.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Anduin | 35/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | Compare |
| Eddaedda.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Edda | 30/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +2 | Compare |
| Juniper Squarejunipersquare.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Juniper Square | 48/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Fundwavefundwave.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Fundwave | 39/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 3 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Chronographchronograph.peSee also Transparency alternatives to Chronograph | 35/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | Compare |
| Passthroughpassthrough.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Passthrough | 35/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | Compare |
| 4Degrees4degrees.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to 4Degrees | 26/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 5 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 | Compare |
| Vestberryvestberry.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Vestberry | 22/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 6 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +3 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.