Transparency alternatives to Juniper Square
Other Fund administration and private markets vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Juniper Square. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 25 that differ from Juniper Square on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Juniper Square has 6 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Juniper Square” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Juniper Square | Found at Juniper Square, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard Metricsstandardmetrics.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Standard Metrics | 57/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Affinityaffinity.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Affinity | 70/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | nothing | Compare |
| Intappintapp.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Intapp | 57/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | Compare |
| Visiblevisible.vcSee also Transparency alternatives to Visible | 52/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Runditrundit.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Rundit | 39/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| Chronographchronograph.peSee also Transparency alternatives to Chronograph | 35/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | Compare |
| Anduinanduintransact.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Anduin | 35/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 Status page with history, Public pricing | Compare |
| Passthroughpassthrough.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Passthrough | 35/100 | 1 Subprocessor list | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Eddaedda.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Edda | 30/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Vestberryvestberry.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Vestberry | 22/100 | 1 Subprocessor list | 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 | Compare |
| Fundwavefundwave.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Fundwave | 39/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| 4Degrees4degrees.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to 4Degrees | 26/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.