Transparency alternatives to Edda
Other Fund administration and private markets vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Edda. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 25 that differ from Edda on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Edda has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Edda” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Edda | Found at Edda, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Affinityaffinity.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Affinity | 70/100 | 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +2 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Intappintapp.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Intapp | 57/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +1 | 2 Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Standard Metricsstandardmetrics.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Standard Metrics | 57/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +1 | 2 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Runditrundit.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Rundit | 39/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | 4 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | Compare |
| Visiblevisible.vcSee also Transparency alternatives to Visible | 52/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Juniper Squarejunipersquare.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Juniper Square | 48/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Named privacy contact | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Fundwavefundwave.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Fundwave | 39/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Named privacy contact | 2 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Anduinanduintransact.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Anduin | 35/100 | 3 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | 2 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Chronographchronograph.peSee also Transparency alternatives to Chronograph | 35/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change | 3 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Passthroughpassthrough.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Passthrough | 35/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Status page with history | 2 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| 4Degrees4degrees.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to 4Degrees | 26/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Vestlanevestlane.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Vestlane | 22/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 3 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.