SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Chronograph

Other Fund administration and private markets vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Chronograph does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 20 that differ from Chronograph on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Chronograph has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Chronograph does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Chronograph does notChronograph publishes, and they do not
Affinityaffinity.co 70/100 4 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 nothing Compare
Intappintapp.com 70/100 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 1 Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Juniper Squarejunipersquare.com 48/100 4 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Anduinanduintransact.com 35/100 4 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Fundwavefundwave.com 39/100 3 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Eddaedda.co 22/100 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +1 Compare
Arcesiumarcesium.com 17/100 3 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +1 Compare
Runditrundit.com 39/100 2 Data processing agreement, Named privacy contact 2 Subprocessor list, Status page with history Compare
Passthroughpassthrough.com 35/100 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Allvueallvuesystems.com 30/100 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
4Degrees4degrees.ai 26/100 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Bipsyncbipsync.com 22/100 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.