Alternatives to Authentik
Other Password and identity vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Authentik does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 24 that differ from Authentik on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Authentik has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Authentik does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Authentik does not | Authentik publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ping Identitypingidentity.com | 74/100 | 6 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +3 | nothing | Compare |
| Keeperkeepersecurity.com | 85/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| WorkOSworkos.com | 60/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +2 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| 1Password1password.com | 70/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Clerkclerk.com | 70/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Oktaokta.com | 61/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Fronteggfrontegg.com | 39/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Duo Securityduo.com | 48/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named | nothing | Compare |
| Oryory.com | 43/100 | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure | nothing | Compare |
| Passboltpassbolt.com | 43/100 | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
| Descopedescope.com | 39/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, Named privacy contact | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| FusionAuthfusionauth.io | 39/100 | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.