SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Ping Identity

Other Password and identity vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Ping Identity does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 24 that differ from Ping Identity on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Ping Identity has 3 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent. The column “publishes and Ping Identity does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Ping Identity does notPing Identity publishes, and they do not
Keeperkeepersecurity.com 85/100 2 Data processing agreement, No third-party tracking before consent 1 Status page with history Compare
WorkOSworkos.com 60/100 2 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure 3 Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
1Password1password.com 70/100 1 Data processing agreement 1 Subprocessor list Compare
Clerkclerk.com 70/100 1 Data processing agreement 1 Subprocessor list Compare
Oktaokta.com 61/100 1 Data processing agreement 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Oryory.com 43/100 1 Uptime SLA with a figure 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 Compare
Descopedescope.com 39/100 1 Uptime SLA with a figure 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 Compare
Duo Securityduo.com 48/100 nothing we found there and not here 3 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact Compare
Stytchstytch.com 45/100 nothing we found there and not here 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Passboltpassbolt.com 43/100 nothing we found there and not here 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Bitwardenbitwarden.com 40/100 nothing we found there and not here 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Dashlanedashlane.com 39/100 nothing we found there and not here 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.