SaaS Ranking
Menu

Keeper: what they publish

keepersecurity.com · Password and identity · checked 2026-10-10

74/100BBand B

Rank 1 of 35 in Password and identity, where the median is 26.

Public transparency score, not a product or security rating. Latest check: 2026-10-10. How the score works.

Evidence at a glance

Choose a check to see its source, date and scope.

Not found means not found at the addresses we checked. Not measured means we could not complete the check.

Start a vendor reviewDownload evidence (CSV)

Overview

6 days since the newest dated result, 6 since the oldest. 12 of 12 criteria have a measured result in the last 30 days. Failed checks and undated results are excluded.

Evidence freshness is a statement about our measurement and is kept apart from the transparency score, which is frozen at v1. How good our own measurement is.

Transparency labelsaas-ranking.com

Keeper

keepersecurity.com · Password and identity

  1. A
  2. B
  3. C
  4. D
  5. E
  6. F
B 74of 100 Rank 1 of 35

Published commitments6 of 9 found

Measured behaviour3 of 3 found

Checked 2026-10-10. Every line links the page we found it on. A cross means we found nothing at the addresses we checked, not that the vendor has no such document. A transparency score, not a product rating.

Downloads include all checks, source URLs, dates and the snapshot ID for your procurement file. We do not issue badges.

The label is the whole measurement in one object: every criterion with its weight, the band, and the date. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Every line in it links the page we found the result on, or lists the addresses we checked. A cross means we found nothing there, not that Keeper has no such document.

Where Keeper sits in Password and identity

  1. A0 0%
  2. B1 3%
  3. C3 9%
  4. D7 20%
  5. E8 23%
  6. F16 46%
35 vendors with a score; 2 more without a score because we could measure too little. Bands have fixed thresholds, see how the score works.

The band of Keeper is marked. Vendors without a score are the ones where we could measure too few criteria to rank them – a gap on our side, counted separately.

What Keeper states

The exact figures and names we read off the pages linked below, with the sentence they stand in. This is what they publish, not what we verified about their systems.

Gaps, heaviest first

✗

Data location: where they say data is hosted

weight 3 of 3

No statement about data location found.

Checked 7 addresses on 2026-10-10.

Show the 7 addresses we checked
  1. https://keepersecurity.com/security – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  2. https://keepersecurity.com/trust – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  3. https://keepersecurity.com/legal/privacy – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  4. https://keepersecurity.com/privacy – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  5. https://keepersecurity.com/privacy-policy – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  6. https://keepersecurity.com/compliance – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  7. https://keepersecurity.com/legal/privacy-policy – reached, no match (HTTP 404)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Across the market: Data location stated in Password and identity: 8 of 37 companies

✗

Status page with incident history

weight 2 of 3

No public status page found.

Checked 3 addresses on 2026-10-10.

Show the 3 addresses we checked
  1. https://status.keepersecurity.com/ – The name "status.keepersecurity.com" could not be resolved.
  2. https://keepersecurity.com/status – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  3. https://keepersecurity.com.statuspage.io/ – Could not be fetched: fetch failed.

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Across the market: Status page with history in Password and identity: 10 of 37 companies

✗

Uptime SLA with a figure

weight 1 of 3

No uptime figure found.

Checked 6 addresses on 2026-10-10.

Show the 6 addresses we checked
  1. https://keepersecurity.com/legal/sla – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  2. https://keepersecurity.com/sla – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  3. https://keepersecurity.com/legal/service-level-agreement – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  4. https://keepersecurity.com/trust/sla – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  5. https://keepersecurity.com/uptime – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  6. https://keepersecurity.com/legal/uptime-sla – reached, no match (HTTP 404)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Across the market: Uptime SLA with a figure in Password and identity: 3 of 35 companies

Evidence

The full source lists sit behind these two groups, so that the answer above stays readable.

Published, with a source 9
✓

Data processing agreement (DPA)

weight 3 of 3

Published and readable without a login.

Source: https://www.keepersecurity.com/legal/dpa/ · checked 2026-10-10

Across the market: Data processing agreement in Password and identity: 8 of 36 companies

✓

Subprocessors: the published list

weight 3 of 3

The actual list is published, not just a promise to keep one.

Source: https://www.keepersecurity.com/legal/sub-processors/ · checked 2026-10-10

Across the market: Subprocessor list in Password and identity: 4 of 36 companies

✓

Public pricing with figures

weight 2 of 3

Actual numbers on a public page.

Source: https://www.keepersecurity.com/pricing/business-and-enterprise.html?t=b · checked 2026-10-10

Across the market: Public pricing in Password and identity: 26 of 37 companies

✓

HTTPS enforced with HSTS

weight 2 of 3

HTTP redirects to HTTPS and the HSTS header is set.

Source: https://keepersecurity.com/ · checked 2026-10-10

Across the market: HTTPS enforced with HSTS in Password and identity: 30 of 37 companies

✓weight 2 of 3

No third-party requests before any interaction.

Source: https://keepersecurity.com/ · checked 2026-10-10

Across the market: No third-party tracking before consent in Password and identity: 1 of 36 companies

✓

Notice before subprocessors change

weight 2 of 3

The vendor commits publicly to giving notice before the list changes.

Source: https://www.keepersecurity.com/legal/dpa/ · checked 2026-10-10

Across the market: Notice before subprocessors change in Password and identity: 6 of 35 companies

✓

Certifications named (SOC 2, ISO 27001)

weight 1 of 3

SOC 2 or ISO 27001 named on a public page.

  • Named on that page FedRAMP (unclear from the sentence), HIPAA (unclear from the sentence), ISO/IEC 27001 (unclear from the sentence), PCI DSS (unclear from the sentence), SOC 2 (not counted: the sentence does not carry it), SOC 2 Type II (unclear from the sentence). The sentence we kept does not carry this finding on its own, so it counts in no list and no figure.
    Show the 6 exact wordings

    Keeper is GDPR compliant, CCPA compliant, HIPAA compliant, FedRAMP High and GovRAMP High Authorized, PCI DSS certified and certified by TrustArc for privacy.

    Read at https://www.keepersecurity.com/security.html

    Keeper is GDPR compliant, CCPA compliant, HIPAA compliant, FedRAMP High and GovRAMP High Authorized, PCI DSS certified and certified by TrustArc fo

    Read at https://www.keepersecurity.com/security.html

    Keeper is ISO 27001, 27017 and 27018 certified.

    Read at https://www.keepersecurity.com/security.html

    eeper is GDPR compliant, CCPA compliant, HIPAA compliant, FedRAMP High and GovRAMP High Authorized, PCI DSS certified and certified by TrustArc for privacy.

    Read at https://www.keepersecurity.com/security.html

    Keeper has the longest-standing SOC 2 and ISO certifications in the industry.

    Read at https://www.keepersecurity.com/security.html

    Keeper has been certified as SOC 2 Type 2 compliant for over ten years in accordance with the AICPA Service Organization Control frame

    Read at https://www.keepersecurity.com/security.html

Source: https://www.keepersecurity.com/security.html · checked 2026-10-10

Across the market: Certifications named in Password and identity: 19 of 36 companies

✓

security.txt (RFC 9116)

weight 1 of 3

Served at /.well-known/security.txt.

Source: https://keepersecurity.com/.well-known/security.txt · checked 2026-10-10

Across the market: security.txt (RFC 9116) in Password and identity: 16 of 36 companies

✓

Named privacy contact (DPO or privacy address)

weight 1 of 3

A data protection officer or a dedicated privacy address is named.

Source: https://www.keepersecurity.com/legal/terms-of-use/?s=privacy · checked 2026-10-10

Across the market: Named privacy contact in Password and identity: 15 of 36 companies

History

Not enough completed runs yet to draw a line. The next runs fill this in.

Prepare your vendor review

A source is a starting point. Check the product, plan, legal entity and date before treating it as evidence for your purchase. These questions do not change the transparency score.

Keeper

9 found · 3 not found · 0 not measured across 12 public checks.

12 of 12 criteria have a measured result from the last 30 days. Oldest dated result: 2026-10-10.

Investigate 3 open evidence questions
  1. Data location stated

    Which locations apply to our primary data, backups and support access? Which region can we select for this plan?

    Inspect this check
  2. Status page with history

    Where can we review incident history for the service we will use, and how do we subscribe to incident updates?

    Inspect this check
  3. Uptime SLA with a figure

    Which availability commitment applies to our plan? Please include the measurement window, exclusions and credit claim process.

    Inspect this check

Compare

A shortlist holds up to six vendors across categories and lives entirely in the address of its page: share the link, bookmark it, put it in a ticket. Nothing is stored, so we do not know it exists.