Alternatives to Logto
Other Password and identity vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Logto does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 24 that differ from Logto on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Logto has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Logto does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Logto does not | Logto publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ping Identitypingidentity.com | 74/100 | 7 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +4 | nothing | Compare |
| Keeperkeepersecurity.com | 85/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +3 | nothing | Compare |
| Oktaokta.com | 61/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +3 | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
| 1Password1password.com | 70/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| Clerkclerk.com | 70/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| WorkOSworkos.com | 60/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Duo Securityduo.com | 48/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Oryory.com | 43/100 | 4 Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Passboltpassbolt.com | 43/100 | 4 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Dashlanedashlane.com | 39/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
| Descopedescope.com | 39/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
| FusionAuthfusionauth.io | 39/100 | 4 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | nothing | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.