SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Passbolt

Other Password and identity vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Passbolt does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 24 that differ from Passbolt on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Passbolt has 6 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and Passbolt does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Passbolt does notPassbolt publishes, and they do not
Keeperkeepersecurity.com 85/100 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, No third-party tracking before consent nothing Compare
Ping Identitypingidentity.com 74/100 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change nothing Compare
WorkOSworkos.com 60/100 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
1Password1password.com 70/100 2 Data processing agreement, Status page with history nothing Compare
Clerkclerk.com 70/100 2 Data processing agreement, Status page with history nothing Compare
Oktaokta.com 61/100 2 Data processing agreement, Status page with history 1 Certifications named Compare
Descopedescope.com 39/100 2 Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Duo Securityduo.com 48/100 1 Status page with history 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Stytchstytch.com 45/100 1 Status page with history 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Oryory.com 43/100 1 Uptime SLA with a figure 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Dashlanedashlane.com 39/100 1 Subprocessor list 2 Data location stated, Certifications named Compare
Fronteggfrontegg.com 39/100 1 Status page with history 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.