SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to SuperTokens

Other Password and identity vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that SuperTokens does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 24 that differ from SuperTokens on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

SuperTokens has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and SuperTokens does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and SuperTokens does notSuperTokens publishes, and they do not
Ping Identitypingidentity.com 74/100 7 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +4 nothing Compare
Keeperkeepersecurity.com 85/100 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +3 nothing Compare
1Password1password.com 70/100 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +2 nothing Compare
Clerkclerk.com 70/100 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +2 nothing Compare
Oktaokta.com 61/100 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +2 nothing Compare
WorkOSworkos.com 60/100 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +2 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Duo Securityduo.com 48/100 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 nothing Compare
Oryory.com 43/100 4 Data location stated, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 nothing Compare
Passboltpassbolt.com 43/100 4 Data location stated, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 nothing Compare
Fronteggfrontegg.com 39/100 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
FusionAuthfusionauth.io 39/100 4 Status page with history, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 nothing Compare
Dashlanedashlane.com 39/100 3 Subprocessor list, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact nothing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.