Alternatives to PagerDuty
Other Incident management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that PagerDuty does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 22 that differ from PagerDuty on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
PagerDuty has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116). The column “publishes and PagerDuty does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and PagerDuty does not | PagerDuty publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ilertilert.com | 70/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +1 | 1 Subprocessor list | Compare |
| incident.ioincident.io | 65/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Moogsoftmoogsoft.com | 61/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| All Quietallquiet.app | 48/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 3 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Causelycausely.ai | 48/100 | 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent | 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| AlertOpsalertops.com | 43/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 3 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Everbridgeeverbridge.com | 39/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 4 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | Compare |
| BigPandabigpanda.io | 39/100 | 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| FireHydrantfirehydrant.com | 39/100 | 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| PagerTreepagertree.com | 35/100 | 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 3 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Spike.shspike.sh | 30/100 | 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 4 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | Compare |
| xMattersxmatters.com | 30/100 | 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 3 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.