SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Duck Creek

Other Insurance software vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Duck Creek. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 59 that differ from Duck Creek on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Duck Creek has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Duck Creek” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at Duck CreekFound at Duck Creek, not found there
Guidewireguidewire.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Guidewire 35/100 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 Subprocessor list, Certifications named Compare
Zegurozeguro.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Zeguro 35/100 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 Subprocessor list, Named privacy contact Compare
Ezlynxezlynx.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Ezlynx 26/100 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 Subprocessor list, Data location stated Compare
Ivansivans.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Ivans 26/100 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 Subprocessor list, Data location stated Compare
Root Platformrootplatform.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Root Platform 26/100 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 Subprocessor list, Data location stated Compare
Sapienssapiens.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Sapiens 26/100 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 Subprocessor list, Data location stated Compare
Clarkclark.deSee also Transparency alternatives to Clark 17/100 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named Compare
Nowcertsnowcerts.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Nowcerts 17/100 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 Compare
Ottonovaottonova.deSee also Transparency alternatives to Ottonova 17/100 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named Compare
Quest Analyticsquestanalytics.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Quest Analytics 17/100 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named Compare
Crawfordcrawco.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Crawford 26/100 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 Subprocessor list, Certifications named Compare
Five Sigmafivesigmalabs.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Five Sigma 26/100 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 Subprocessor list, Certifications named Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.