SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Guidewire

Other Insurance software vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Guidewire does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 28 that differ from Guidewire on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Guidewire has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and Guidewire does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Guidewire does notGuidewire publishes, and they do not
Duck Creekduckcreek.com 35/100 2 Subprocessor list, Certifications named 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Zegurozeguro.com 35/100 2 Public pricing, Certifications named 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact Compare
Ezlynxezlynx.com 39/100 1 Certifications named nothing Compare
Ivansivans.com 39/100 1 Certifications named nothing Compare
Root Platformrootplatform.com 26/100 1 Certifications named 1 Data location stated Compare
Clarkclark.de 17/100 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Data location stated, Status page with history Compare
Eberleberls.com 17/100 1 Certifications named 2 Data location stated, Status page with history Compare
Nowcertsnowcerts.com 17/100 1 Public pricing 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Named privacy contact Compare
Majescomajesco.com 14/100 1 Certifications named 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Named privacy contact Compare
Agencyblocagencybloc.com 13/100 1 Certifications named 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Named privacy contact Compare
Clearspeedclearspeed.com 26/100 nothing we found there and not here 1 Status page with history Compare
Crawfordcrawco.com 26/100 nothing we found there and not here 1 Status page with history Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.