Transparency alternatives to Ivans
Other Insurance software vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Ivans. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 57 that differ from Ivans on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Ivans has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Ivans” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Ivans | Found at Ivans, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Duck Creekduckcreek.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Duck Creek | 35/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Data location stated | 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Zegurozeguro.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Zeguro | 35/100 | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Guidewireguidewire.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Guidewire | 35/100 | 1 Data location stated | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
| Crawfordcrawco.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Crawford | 26/100 | 1 Data location stated | 2 Status page with history, Certifications named | Compare |
| Five Sigmafivesigmalabs.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Five Sigma | 26/100 | 1 Data location stated | 2 Status page with history, Certifications named | Compare |
| Sapienssapiens.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Sapiens | 26/100 | 1 Public pricing | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| Snapsheetsnapsheetclaims.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Snapsheet | 26/100 | 1 Data location stated | 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Tinubutinubu.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Tinubu | 26/100 | 1 Data location stated | 2 Status page with history, Certifications named | Compare |
| InsuredHQinsuredhq.comSee also Transparency alternatives to InsuredHQ | 22/100 | 1 Data location stated | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Korrkorr.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Korr | 22/100 | 1 Data location stated | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Clarkclark.deSee also Transparency alternatives to Clark | 17/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 Status page with history, Certifications named | Compare |
| EIS Groupeisgroup.comSee also Transparency alternatives to EIS Group | 17/100 | 1 Data location stated | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.