Transparency alternatives to Amplified
Other Patent and trademark management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Amplified. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 28 that differ from Amplified on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Amplified has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Amplified” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Amplified | Found at Amplified, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PatSnappatsnap.comSee also Transparency alternatives to PatSnap | 52/100 | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Doppeldoppel.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Doppel | 50/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| IPRallyiprally.comSee also Transparency alternatives to IPRally | 48/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | 3 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| PatentBotspatentbots.comSee also Transparency alternatives to PatentBots | 48/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | 3 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Wellspringwellspring.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Wellspring | 48/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Named privacy contact | 3 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| TechInsightstechinsights.comSee also Transparency alternatives to TechInsights | 32/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Corsearchcorsearch.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Corsearch | 26/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Named privacy contact | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent, +1 | Compare |
| Questelquestel.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Questel | 22/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | 5 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | Compare |
| Minesoftminesoft.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Minesoft | 9/100 | 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 5 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | Compare |
| EBRANDebrand.comSee also Transparency alternatives to EBRAND | 26/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 3 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Inteuminteum.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Inteum | 17/100 | 1 Certifications named | 4 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, +1 | Compare |
| MyMediaboxmymediabox.comSee also Transparency alternatives to MyMediabox | 17/100 | 1 Status page with history | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent, +1 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.